Explaining VC
Navigating the World of Family Office Structures for Startup Funding
Discover the key distinctions between FOs. Learn what each type seeks in investments and what you should look for in return.
Loading
Loading
VC isn't right for every startup. Learn the 8 questions to ask before raising, how to find investors who actually fit your company, and the systematic process that closes deals.
Mark Bugas
Venture capital is only right for startups that can realistically reach $100M+ in revenue within 8-10 years in large, expanding markets, and requires founders willing to give up significant ownership and control in exchange for aggressive growth capital. The answer to whether you should raise VC starts with eight critical questions:
If you answer yes to these questions, successful VC fundraising requires spending 70% of your time preparing (building a qualified list of 30-50 investors matching your stage, sector, geography, and check size, mapping warm introduction paths, and perfecting your materials) and only 30% executing, because most founders waste months pitching investors who cannot write them a check due to thesis misalignment.
A typical conversion funnel might look like 250 target investors, leading to 100 investors contacted, 30 meetings, 10 second meetings, 5 deep diligence processes, and 2-3 term sheets over 3-6 months, meaning you need rigorous targeting, systematic warm introductions, and compressed calendar density to create competitive momentum rather than a dragged-out process that signals weak interest.
1️⃣ Can you realistically reach $100M in revenue within 8-10 years?
This isn't about ambition or vision. It's math. VCs need massive exits because most of their portfolio companies will fail. If your business model can't scale to that level within that timeframe, VC economics simply don't work.
2️⃣ Is your market large enough to support that growth?
Small markets cap your upside. VCs invest in companies that can dominate large, expanding markets. If you're targeting a niche that tops out at $50M total addressable market, you're not a fit.
3️⃣ Is your business model actually scalable?
Service businesses, lifestyle companies, and businesses with unfavorable unit economics don't scale the way VCs need them to. Understanding your financial model isn't optional.
4️⃣ Do you have a clear path to significant revenue?
Everything we're discussing doesn't matter if there's no clear path to generating substantial revenue. VCs invest in businesses, not science experiments.
1️⃣ Are you willing to give up control and ownership?
With each funding round, you'll own less of your company (check out Dilution Calculator) and have less decision-making authority. More investors mean more board members, more opinions, and more constraints. If you want full control, bootstrap.
2️⃣ Can you navigate 8-10 years of intense stress?
Building a venture-backed company is a marathon sprint. The pressure is relentless. The expectations are enormous. If you're not built for that duration and intensity, reconsider.
3️⃣ Are you willing to exit?
Here's the duality: you need to commit to 8-10 years of building, but you can't plan to run a lifestyle business in perpetuity. VCs need liquidity events. If you want to build a company you run forever, VC isn't the path.
4️⃣ Have you explored alternatives to VC?
Most founders jump straight to venture capital without considering other options. That's a mistake.
Before you spend months chasing VCs, understand what else is available:
We're seeing a surge in debt financing across the venture ecosystem, from seed-stage companies to growth rounds:
There's been a recent surge in founders leveraging grants. It's free money if you qualify and can navigate the application process.
The most underrated source of capital. If you can build a business that generates cash, you maintain control and avoid dilution entirely.
If you've answered "yes" to those eight questions and determined VC is right for you, here's what the landscape looks like:
Important caveat: These numbers vary dramatically by geography. Silicon Valley and New York command premium valuations. A YC company might raise at a $20M post-money valuation for pre-seed, which would be insane for a Midwest or Southern startup. Austin falls somewhere in the middle.
For geographic-specific data, check out Carta's state-by-state analysis and PitchBook's regional breakdowns in their quarterly Venture Monitor reports.
According to PitchBook-NVCA's Venture Monitor (as of September 30, 2025), here's where median valuations and deal sizes actually landed across all stages:
Here's where most founders waste their time: they pitch anyone with "Ventures" in their name.
When VCs raise their funds, they make explicit promises to their limited partners (LPs) about their investment strategy:
This is not flexible. An early-stage fund that invests in pre-seed and seed cannot write a Series B check. A growth-stage fund requiring $5M ARR will not invest in a pre-product company.
Yet founders ignore this constantly.
Before you add an investor to your target list, verify:
This isn't hard research. It's publicly available information on their websites, Crunchbase, and LinkedIn. Doing this basic homework separates you from 80% of founders. Flowlie can also help with that, see how.
Once you have a list of investors who can invest in your company, you need to determine who should invest.
Capital is abundant. Strategic partners are rare.
When you bring on an investor, especially one leading your round with a board seat, you're entering a multi-year partnership. Choose poorly and you'll have someone without expertise or network giving you bad advice and making decisions about your company.
What to look for beyond the check:
Don't assume that because someone invests in your sector, they're an expert. There are plenty of "generalist" partners at sector-focused firms who don't actually understand your business.
The single biggest mistake founders make: they start pitching before they're ready.
Here's the truth: the moment you tell investors "I'm raising," a clock starts ticking. Momentum matters. If your process drags on for months, investors get nervous. If you're not prepared with answers to basic questions, you look amateur.
Spend 70% of your time preparing, 30% executing.
Not all introductions are created equal. Here's the hierarchy:
They have the strongest incentive to help you succeed. They've committed capital. Their reputation is on the line. These intros carry serious weight.
If you're connected to founders who've raised from your target investors, these intros are gold. VCs trust their portfolio founders' judgment implicitly.
Alumni networks, accelerator connections, mutual friends. These work, but carry less weight than the top two.
Cold email works, but conversion rates are significantly lower. If you're going this route, make it count.
Do not ask an investor who passed on you to introduce you to other investors – with one exception. If they passed because you're too early for their stage focus but want to stay in touch, that's different. They're signaling genuine interest in your trajectory. But if they passed because they didn't believe in your business, team, or market? You're asking someone who judged you unworthy of their capital to vouch for you. It never works.
Most founders dramatically underestimate their network reach. You're not just connected to your first-degree contacts – you have access to their networks too. The problem? Manually mapping those connections is impossible at scale.
Flowlie's network analysis solves this. We analyze your LinkedIn data to surface introduction paths you didn't know existed, then score each path based on dual relationship strength: yours to the connector, and the connector's relationship to the target investor. You discover warm paths to investors you thought required cold outreach and prioritize the connectors most likely to make strong introductions on your behalf.
If you need to go cold, keep it ruthlessly concise and clear.
Structure:
Critical rules:
Remember: nobody has ever received a term sheet from a first email. You're optimizing for step one – getting a meeting.
Once you start taking meetings, execution is everything.
Try to schedule most of your investor meetings within a compressed timeframe (2-4 weeks) rather than spreading them over months. Why?
Even if you don't have major news, send bi-weekly updates to investors you've met with. Share small wins, customer conversations, product progress. This keeps you top of mind and demonstrates momentum.
Identify and broadcast exciting milestones as they happen:
These create urgency and give investors a reason to move faster.
Most founders underestimate how many investors they need to talk to.
Typical conversion funnel:
If your conversion rates are worse than this (and they might be for first-time founders), you need a bigger top of funnel. If you need to talk to 50 investors to get one check, and you want to close 10 investors, you need 500 investor conversations.
That's not a failure. That's math. Adjust your expectations and work accordingly.
The average fundraise takes 3-6 months from first meetings to closed round. However, preparation should start 2-3 months before that. If you're spending more than 6 months actively fundraising, you likely need to reassess your approach, traction, or target investor list.
Start with a qualified list of 100+ investors, narrow to 30-50 high-priority targets, and aim for 20-30 first meetings. Typical conversion: 100 targets → 30 meetings → 10 second meetings → 5 deep diligence → 2-3 term sheets. If your conversion rates are worse, you need a bigger funnel.
Not necessarily. If it's from your dream investor at fair terms, yes. But having multiple term sheets gives you negotiating leverage and validates market interest. This is why calendar density matters – getting multiple investors to similar stages simultaneously creates optionality.
First, dig deeper – use tools like Flowlie's network analysis to surface connections you might have missed. If you truly have no path, cold outreach can work, but expect 5-10x lower response rates. Focus on hyper-personalized emails that demonstrate genuine research.
Yes, especially at later stages. However, local investors often provide more hands-on support and relevant network connections.
A lead investor commits the largest check (typically 50%+ of the round), sets the terms, conducts deep diligence, often takes a board seat, and actively works with you post-investment. Participants follow the lead's terms and write smaller checks. You need a lead before most investors will participate.
It depends on stage. Pre-seed: proof of concept, early customer conversations, ideally a prototype. Seed: product in market, some revenue or strong user engagement metrics. Series A: $1-3M ARR for B2B SaaS, or significant user growth with clear monetization path for consumer. Each round up, expectations roughly double.
You need a technical co-founder or a very compelling story about why you don't. Solo non-technical founders raising for technical products face extreme skepticism. Investors assume you'll waste capital on outsourced development or make poor technical decisions. Find a CTO co-founder before fundraising.
Pre-seed and seed typically use post-money SAFEs (simpler, more founder-friendly). Series A and beyond use priced equity rounds. Convertible notes are less common now but still used in some bridge rounds. If an investor insists on unusual terms for your stage, that's a red flag.
If they passed due to stage fit (you're too early for them), maintain the relationship – send quarterly updates. If they passed on the business fundamentals, move on. Don't waste energy trying to convince someone who already said no. Focus on investors who are genuinely interested.
First, diagnose why. Wrong investors? Weak traction? Poor pitch? Bad timing? If you've talked to 50+ qualified investors and can't generate interest, you likely need more traction before raising. Focus on revenue, customer growth, or product milestones that change the narrative, then come back to market.
Yes – Flowlie is specifically built for active fundraises. The platform helps you discover qualified investors, map warm introduction paths, manage your pipeline, track meetings, and analyze investor engagement with your materials. Many founders use it as their central fundraising operating system from prep through close.
Absolutely. Investors will ask detailed questions about unit economics, burn rate, runway, and growth projections. You need a defensible financial model that shows how you'll deploy their capital and what milestones you'll hit.
Pitching investors who can't invest in them due to stage, sector, geography, or check size misalignment. This wastes everyone's time and burns your credibility. Do the basic research on thesis fit before asking for introductions or sending cold emails.
Venture capital is a tool, not a trophy. It's right for companies with massive growth potential and founders willing to embrace the trade-offs.
Before you spend six months pitching, ask yourself:
If you're ready to raise, remember: 70% of your time should be spent preparing, not pitching. Build a qualified list, map your network, prepare your materials, and run a tight process.
Do the basic research. Understand thesis fit. Optimize for warm introductions. Keep your outreach concise and clear. Create calendar density and maintain momentum.
The founders who raise capital aren't necessarily the ones with the best companies. They're the ones who treat fundraising as a systematic process with clear inputs and measurable outputs.
Stop winging it. Start systematizing. Try Flowlie today.
Join thousands of founders using our technology to find the right investors and close rounds faster than ever before.
Discover the key distinctions between FOs. Learn what each type seeks in investments and what you should look for in return.
There are 3 main letters that matter, D, CF, and A. Bear with me till the end and I promise it will make sense.